I feel a rant coming on. I Love the internet. I love that information is instantly available. The knowledge of the universe is at our finger tips. And Knowledge is Power. Instant and unfettered. Uncensored and unverified. Frankly, there is more crap on the internet than real information. But that isn't really a problem, we have been so bombarded with crazy advertisements and false claims that most people know that you can't believe most of what you read, or hear, or see.
People with degrees in psychology get paid very big bucks to manipulate us through advertising, or even set the mood in a bar (lights in many bars are graded to be brighter higher up, fading to warm bronze colors at face level, so everyone looks tan and healthy, fostering the "in crowd" feel). This post is not really about the evils of corporate advertising, although it is one of my favorite rants. Advertising is at least honest in the respect that you know the motive is to sell you something. Buyer beware, etc. No, this rant has more to do with the constant barrage of half truths and warnings that come to me through email, face-book, texts and all other forms of electronic media. This is a rant against all of the people that are trying to keep me safe from computer virus'. poisonous products, terrorist plots, and fake chicken. And to all the people that are defending us from the amoral decisions of our political leaders, sneaky plots of the fraudulent charities, conspiracies of suburban housewives (OK, some of these may be true), and the horrible murderous trend of groups that are secretly gay, Muslim, vegetarian, or not Caucasian. Even just cute heartwarming stories about how some of favorite songs, sayings or cultural icons came to be.
These things become quickly viral. And it always seems to me that the more outrageous the claims, the more people are going to jump on them as true, respond and repost. I'm sure I drive all of my friends crazy, because I'm the one that always checks things out on Snopes.com and sends links to all the people that got the original post. Except, not always. When it is politically motivated, slanderous drivel, I often just sadly shake my head and delete it, because the people that send it are probably not interested in facts, but in propagating something that supports what they see as the truth. I'm a little embarrassed by how much I trust Snopes.com, I will freely admit it is the lazy person's fact check site. I'm sure they make mistakes, but at least they seem to make an effort to try to weed through most of the crap on the internet.
Recently someone sent me a beautiful, sad and poignant story of the origins of the song "Taps." Of course, it was complete crap, but harmless, and the perpetuating a myth that strengthens the power of the song. This is what parables, fables and even religious texts count on. A story that powerfully conveys the sentiment, in these cases, facts are not as important as the truth they convey. Where the rant part comes in is when the post begins with the announcement: "This is true!" "I checked it out on Snopes" or "My grandmother's 2nd cousin's great nephew works for the national confederate library, and he researched this for her." This stuff drives me crazy, especially when 30 seconds of a lazy google search result in a debunking of the story, and any claim to legitimacy. These are the kind of stories that so support a beautiful myth, that if it were not for the wild claims of legitimacy at the beginning, I wouldn't have even looked at Snopes, in fact, I may have reposted it, just because it is a good story.
My Favorite Faulkner quote is something on the lines of: "poets are not interested in facts, but in truths." I'm sure I mangled the quote - funny that it came from the Snope's trilogy - I just realized that. but this principal is what makes poetry, legends, mythology and art WORK - because they portray truths that are greater than the truths that we can grasp with our mere senses, the "facts," those constantly misleading bits of information that can be use to tell greater lies as well as larger truths.
Many years ago, sometime during Desert Storm, my mother gave me an "article" that someone had printed out for her. Computers were not as ubiquitous as they are now, where misinformation can become almost instantly viral,but this was making the email rounds, and someone had gotten a copy to my Mom. The article explained how decades of horrors visited upon us by the Muslim world, and justified a "no holds barred" approach to Iraq. Total destruction was perhaps too good for this monstrous civilization. Now we did not have a computer immediately available, and I had not heard of Snope's yet, but in reading the article, I saw that the discrepancies were obvious, and the tone abundantly so. You have to realize, my Mom is VERY intelligent, and not quick to judge, but the article was playing on fears that she had harbored since my Aunt and Uncle had visited the Middle East, back when Iraq was our friend. As I handed the article back to her, I pointed out that not a single incident listed mentioned Iraq. That all of them were the acts of terrorist groups or countries whose only association with Iraq happened to be global geography. It would be like blaming Canada for the bombing of Hiroshima, or the domestic terrorist acts of Timothy McVey. But there we go, loosely associated "facts" strategically placed to draw conclusions with no basis in truth.
I think, as culture, we are losing the power of critical thought. This is scary to me, as I feel that being able to analyze and interpret the information being thrown at us is our best bet for survival and growth as a civilization, and as individuals. With great Power comes great Responsibility. We are living in an age of fear, and I personally feel that few of our fears are grounded in fact. Our fears are based in mistrust, and a constant barrage of misinformation that supports the fears and mistrust that we started with. So please, please, please check your sources. Especially if the post you are about to send out inflamed your passions, anger, or fear. Chances are they will also add to the general fear and mistrust of your larger social network. How sad is this that? Especially if the information isn't factual, or if you are stirring ugly passions with 1/2 truths designed to mislead or support an agenda of fear and outrage.
Musings of a country-girl transplant. Work, Play, Family, Frustration, and Fun in the sweltering Florida sun. This is the "other-blog" as my public blog is focused on work, research, and a quasi-medical soap box. This is just me.
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Futurama
This will be incomplete - anyone who reads this, please add a comment with more examples.
The future is now! I was watching "That 70's Show" and Red, the curmudgeony old father and Vietnam war vet, was grumbling because he felt that he was not living the future he had been promised, where is the jet pack? where is the hover car? True, the 70's was the beginning of the tech era, and the few techy devices were big, awkward and glitchy. I remember my dad had a "car phone," the size of an igloo cooler, incredibly complicated, nearly useless when he was out in the woods. The popularization of the CB radio put us in touch with random strangers. We played "pong" for hours on our cousin's TV. Our favorite shows were "Lost in Space," and "Star Trek." Ok - my favorite shows were "Bewitched," and "I Dream of Jeannie," but I watched the other ones with my brother.
Now? we have com devices. Except our cell phones do so much more than just communicate with the Enterprise. We have all of the information of the world at our finger tips, and the GPS capabilities that saved Kirk on so many lonely planets. Remember the video phone from "2001 a Space Odyssey?" Dr. Frank Poole calls home to his wife and adoring daughter, and interacts on the large video screen in real time. Skype anyone? When my brother was in Iraq, my mom saw him more than she does when they live in the same state. Many of the sci-fi shows of the 50's-70's treated pay/payments by "credits" as a standard. In the now, many of us use fewer and fewer tangible forms of money. Debit cards are easier than cash. Even small companies often offer direct deposit, and on-line banking is so safe and easy, that I'm even doing it. I just signed my daughter up for a reloadable visa card, I can add money on-line, or have her allowance automatically deducted from my account onto her card, and track everywhere that she uses it. If it is lost or stolen, I get to cancel it.
"With great power comes great responsibility." How cheesy am I? Big Brother IS watching. Many of my friends choose to be completely "off the grid," and function without the comfort and convenience of technology. Somewhere in my heart and head I sympathize with the sentiment; many of us grew up deeply influenced by the cold war, closely guarding all personal information, not wanting to be vulnerable in case of an insidious take over by a subtle foreign (or not so foreign) power. Our children will be much more savvy about how to keep their information private, and they will have better tools for doing so. They will learn from our mistakes, and our criminals. For those that are very concerned that the government is tracking our computers and cell phones, I think a time will come where lack of activity will draw more attention than any specific activity.
I have an adolescent. Like it or not, she will function in this futuresque world where "personal" does not have the same connotation that it had for us.
This age of technology does challenge us as parents to define our moral compass in a new context. We used to worry about our sons getting hold of Penthouse magazine, now we worry about our daughter's sending graphic pictures to their boyfriends via text. Embarrassing moments used to be something you hoped people would forget, now we worry about them becoming viral on You Tube. I still believe that we cannot protect our children from the world, especially one that we barely understand. We can only teach them to protect themselves, and trust that they will learn from their mistakes, and hope that they learn from ours.
The future is now! I was watching "That 70's Show" and Red, the curmudgeony old father and Vietnam war vet, was grumbling because he felt that he was not living the future he had been promised, where is the jet pack? where is the hover car? True, the 70's was the beginning of the tech era, and the few techy devices were big, awkward and glitchy. I remember my dad had a "car phone," the size of an igloo cooler, incredibly complicated, nearly useless when he was out in the woods. The popularization of the CB radio put us in touch with random strangers. We played "pong" for hours on our cousin's TV. Our favorite shows were "Lost in Space," and "Star Trek." Ok - my favorite shows were "Bewitched," and "I Dream of Jeannie," but I watched the other ones with my brother.
Now? we have com devices. Except our cell phones do so much more than just communicate with the Enterprise. We have all of the information of the world at our finger tips, and the GPS capabilities that saved Kirk on so many lonely planets. Remember the video phone from "2001 a Space Odyssey?" Dr. Frank Poole calls home to his wife and adoring daughter, and interacts on the large video screen in real time. Skype anyone? When my brother was in Iraq, my mom saw him more than she does when they live in the same state. Many of the sci-fi shows of the 50's-70's treated pay/payments by "credits" as a standard. In the now, many of us use fewer and fewer tangible forms of money. Debit cards are easier than cash. Even small companies often offer direct deposit, and on-line banking is so safe and easy, that I'm even doing it. I just signed my daughter up for a reloadable visa card, I can add money on-line, or have her allowance automatically deducted from my account onto her card, and track everywhere that she uses it. If it is lost or stolen, I get to cancel it.
"With great power comes great responsibility." How cheesy am I? Big Brother IS watching. Many of my friends choose to be completely "off the grid," and function without the comfort and convenience of technology. Somewhere in my heart and head I sympathize with the sentiment; many of us grew up deeply influenced by the cold war, closely guarding all personal information, not wanting to be vulnerable in case of an insidious take over by a subtle foreign (or not so foreign) power. Our children will be much more savvy about how to keep their information private, and they will have better tools for doing so. They will learn from our mistakes, and our criminals. For those that are very concerned that the government is tracking our computers and cell phones, I think a time will come where lack of activity will draw more attention than any specific activity.
I have an adolescent. Like it or not, she will function in this futuresque world where "personal" does not have the same connotation that it had for us.
This age of technology does challenge us as parents to define our moral compass in a new context. We used to worry about our sons getting hold of Penthouse magazine, now we worry about our daughter's sending graphic pictures to their boyfriends via text. Embarrassing moments used to be something you hoped people would forget, now we worry about them becoming viral on You Tube. I still believe that we cannot protect our children from the world, especially one that we barely understand. We can only teach them to protect themselves, and trust that they will learn from their mistakes, and hope that they learn from ours.
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Of Twenties, Teens and Tweens
I have one of each. Sort of. I inherited the older 2 when I married the wonderful Darling Man. The nearly teen is mine. The 26 year old and nearly man are now roommates. It is kind of cute, they are so "brother and sister," but the she still takes care of him like he is 5, and he still teases his big sister like he's 12.
They have decided to get a dog. She already has one. Maddy - my only grandpuppy. Sweet, loving. Annoying, hyper little pee factory. Recently the Nearly Man went to the Largo SPCA (great facility) and he convinced his sister they needed a dog. So the search is on. Humane society, rescue sites, SPCA. Then they decide to go to the pound - because they want to rescue a dog from being euthanized, and because pound adoptions are cheap. But they really can't agree on what dog. He wants medium to big - a border collie or Aussie, something that will catch a frisbee and play with him. Or a lab that will wrestle and run. She wants a playmate for Maddy, and is absolutely opposed to long hair shedding dogs. The compromise seems to be hounds. Maybe because they are short she thinks they are small? anyway - every puppy on line is adorable, and they want them all.
Friday the took a trek to the pound, and took the little sister and one of her friends with them. Just before they left, they mentioned that they can't get a dog for at least a month, because they are baby-sitting their Mom's dogs until she moves. WHAT? you are going to the saddest place on earth, knowing that you can't help any of them right now? Did anyone think this through?
I got the call about 1/2 an hour later. I did not even bother to say "hello." I answered with "NO, you are not bringing a dog home." long pause. "How did you know what I was going to say?" well - because I am OMNI-mom - the all knowing and far-seeing. It was the superior powers of my crystal ball that allowed me to fortell her thoughts, even at that great distance. She doesn't want a dog, she just wants to babysit until the siblings can take it home. Except that we will be gone for two weeks, leaving the darling man to care for our 2 dogs, 1 cat, 1 1/2 rabbits, lizard, bird, house, yard, and full time job with out us. I told her to call him. He laughed. She hung up. Apparently there were real tears involved.
Another parenting lesson learned. Treks to the pound when you are not actually getting a dog may not be a great idea with emotional young people. Still - they all want to do it again. They are even more determined to rescue a puppy.
Completely off the subject. I am very proud of my daughter and her friends. Navigating adolescence is hard, and they are helping each other through, and keeping each other on track.
They have decided to get a dog. She already has one. Maddy - my only grandpuppy. Sweet, loving. Annoying, hyper little pee factory. Recently the Nearly Man went to the Largo SPCA (great facility) and he convinced his sister they needed a dog. So the search is on. Humane society, rescue sites, SPCA. Then they decide to go to the pound - because they want to rescue a dog from being euthanized, and because pound adoptions are cheap. But they really can't agree on what dog. He wants medium to big - a border collie or Aussie, something that will catch a frisbee and play with him. Or a lab that will wrestle and run. She wants a playmate for Maddy, and is absolutely opposed to long hair shedding dogs. The compromise seems to be hounds. Maybe because they are short she thinks they are small? anyway - every puppy on line is adorable, and they want them all.
Friday the took a trek to the pound, and took the little sister and one of her friends with them. Just before they left, they mentioned that they can't get a dog for at least a month, because they are baby-sitting their Mom's dogs until she moves. WHAT? you are going to the saddest place on earth, knowing that you can't help any of them right now? Did anyone think this through?
I got the call about 1/2 an hour later. I did not even bother to say "hello." I answered with "NO, you are not bringing a dog home." long pause. "How did you know what I was going to say?" well - because I am OMNI-mom - the all knowing and far-seeing. It was the superior powers of my crystal ball that allowed me to fortell her thoughts, even at that great distance. She doesn't want a dog, she just wants to babysit until the siblings can take it home. Except that we will be gone for two weeks, leaving the darling man to care for our 2 dogs, 1 cat, 1 1/2 rabbits, lizard, bird, house, yard, and full time job with out us. I told her to call him. He laughed. She hung up. Apparently there were real tears involved.
Another parenting lesson learned. Treks to the pound when you are not actually getting a dog may not be a great idea with emotional young people. Still - they all want to do it again. They are even more determined to rescue a puppy.
Completely off the subject. I am very proud of my daughter and her friends. Navigating adolescence is hard, and they are helping each other through, and keeping each other on track.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Soup Nazi
I also learned that the fam does not like fish balls. I really thought it would be a nice, light protein boost, and would be delicious. Fish Ball Soup just sounds so amazing. And the soup was really good. Except for the fish balls. The husband ate them, proof that he will eat anything. I forced the girl to eat two. I ate all of mine, but it will not show up on the menu again. The dogs were ecstatic. what to do with a pound of fish balls?
The egg drop soup was really easy, and turned out looking and tasting just like egg drop soup. Ewwww. The girl child loves egg drop soup. I find it slimy, and nauseating. The Darling Man ate it, even complimented the texture. I don't think that they noticed that I ate chicken and rice noodle soup left-overs. Next week I'm feeling italian. I think I'll make sausage (turkey) and tortellini soup. I know it is summer, and not soup season. Don't judge me. Maybe I'll do salad and cold plates all winter. Florida is hot all year round, the seasons are blended, and on the two or three days that feel like it might be soup weather, we usually do chili. I have promised the darling man that it will work its way out of my system. For now - I must make soup!
Since this is a total foodie post, I just gotta mention the deserts. Yummy angel food cake, and key-lime pie (gotta do something with all of those yolks) topped off with fresh berries and home made whipped cream. Last night we made key-lime pie ice cream. It doesn't get more summery than that!
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Love by the Numbers
This is an old story, but it has been on my mind alot lately so, I thought I'd share.
When I split up from the Darling Daughter's Dad (DDD). I was pretty devastated, divorced from the 1st husband, separated from the father of my child, feeling like a two-time loser with zero ability to pick a mate, I holed up like a hermit for about 3 months. The first time I went out with friends, I ran into the ex. He was happy, hanging with some girl, looked like his classic "sneaker date." He invites a bunch of people he knows to the same venue, corrals the object of interest for most of the evening, makes his play. If it doesn't work out, no harm, no foul, it wasn't really a date. We were civil, nice almost. I met a guy that asked me how I knew him, and was really impressed that we seemed so adult about the break up (not knowing it was a recent break-up). Then he went on to tell me he had known the DDD for about 3 years, and admired him as a fun, crowd pleasing, single guy. WTF????? we had been separate for 3 month? I'm home with the under 5 year old! How single had he been all this time?
So I went home, angry, heart-sick, feeling like I'd been duped, and started writing madly in the "angry" journal. And I came up with a brilliant idea. I would make a list. A master list. One that would embody all of my values and core principals, one that would, in effect, shield me from future stupid mistakes. It was a list of criteria for my next love interest. Things that are so important to me that straying from the list at all would be a DEAL BREAKER. There were 15 items on the list, and they were all important: Sense of humor, financial security, generosity, not wasteful, politically moderate, religiously open-minded, caring, out-doorsy, non-judgmental, etc., etc. The first thing I wrote was "Hard Body." Immediately under that I wrote: "You shallow b***h, how did that even make the list?" - I wouldn't even meet my own criteria. And then I ran the ex through the list, he hit 6. Then I ran my 1st husband through the list - he hit 7. Wait - I'm actually getting WORSE at picking guys? Totally hanging it up - I obviously have better chances for happiness as a single mom.
And that was it. I started prioritizing things that were important. Went to dancing venues with friends that I knew the DDD wouldn't show up at, spent more time doing crafts, hanging with the girl friends, working harder. Life was good. Now - a little about Mike.
I have known Mike for years. He was one of those people that would hold the darling girl so her dad and I could dance. He was also my favorite dance partner when someone else had the girl. Nice guy, great dad. I knew he and his ex through their break up. Talk about mature! They still have a great relationship. I started running into him at Contra Dances, and he was fun, but ZERO attraction. One night we stopped for a beer after dancing, and he let me know he was interested - I put a stop to that! Need to get my life back in order, blah, blah, lets talk again in a year, blah, blah. Bought myself some time anyway. He came over to the house a couple of times to help me with my web-site, his 13 year old and my 6 year old got along fairly well. Whatever.
One day I was flipping through some old journals and found "The List." Just for kicks and giggles, I decided to run Mike through the list. 14 of 15. Seriously? Who would have thunk it? Those are good numbers. And what did he miss? You guessed it. The one I was totally embarrassed by, the one that did not address what I believe to be my own values. I crossed off "Hard Body" and added "Computer Geek." Wow 15/15
So - I initiated a "sneaker date" of my own. He thought he was working on the web-site. I got rid of the kid and cooked him dinner. By the end of the evening it was very clear that the "attraction" thing was NOT a problem. And a year later we got married. So the moral of the story? If you are one of those people that follow your heart, and your heart tends to screw you over and over - try letting your head weigh in on it once in awhile. 6 years later, I am truly living the dream, I have the best husband, partner, lover, computer guy in the world! I'd say lucky me - but it was a calculated coup, and I couldn't be happier.
When I split up from the Darling Daughter's Dad (DDD). I was pretty devastated, divorced from the 1st husband, separated from the father of my child, feeling like a two-time loser with zero ability to pick a mate, I holed up like a hermit for about 3 months. The first time I went out with friends, I ran into the ex. He was happy, hanging with some girl, looked like his classic "sneaker date." He invites a bunch of people he knows to the same venue, corrals the object of interest for most of the evening, makes his play. If it doesn't work out, no harm, no foul, it wasn't really a date. We were civil, nice almost. I met a guy that asked me how I knew him, and was really impressed that we seemed so adult about the break up (not knowing it was a recent break-up). Then he went on to tell me he had known the DDD for about 3 years, and admired him as a fun, crowd pleasing, single guy. WTF????? we had been separate for 3 month? I'm home with the under 5 year old! How single had he been all this time?
So I went home, angry, heart-sick, feeling like I'd been duped, and started writing madly in the "angry" journal. And I came up with a brilliant idea. I would make a list. A master list. One that would embody all of my values and core principals, one that would, in effect, shield me from future stupid mistakes. It was a list of criteria for my next love interest. Things that are so important to me that straying from the list at all would be a DEAL BREAKER. There were 15 items on the list, and they were all important: Sense of humor, financial security, generosity, not wasteful, politically moderate, religiously open-minded, caring, out-doorsy, non-judgmental, etc., etc. The first thing I wrote was "Hard Body." Immediately under that I wrote: "You shallow b***h, how did that even make the list?" - I wouldn't even meet my own criteria. And then I ran the ex through the list, he hit 6. Then I ran my 1st husband through the list - he hit 7. Wait - I'm actually getting WORSE at picking guys? Totally hanging it up - I obviously have better chances for happiness as a single mom.
And that was it. I started prioritizing things that were important. Went to dancing venues with friends that I knew the DDD wouldn't show up at, spent more time doing crafts, hanging with the girl friends, working harder. Life was good. Now - a little about Mike.
I have known Mike for years. He was one of those people that would hold the darling girl so her dad and I could dance. He was also my favorite dance partner when someone else had the girl. Nice guy, great dad. I knew he and his ex through their break up. Talk about mature! They still have a great relationship. I started running into him at Contra Dances, and he was fun, but ZERO attraction. One night we stopped for a beer after dancing, and he let me know he was interested - I put a stop to that! Need to get my life back in order, blah, blah, lets talk again in a year, blah, blah. Bought myself some time anyway. He came over to the house a couple of times to help me with my web-site, his 13 year old and my 6 year old got along fairly well. Whatever.
One day I was flipping through some old journals and found "The List." Just for kicks and giggles, I decided to run Mike through the list. 14 of 15. Seriously? Who would have thunk it? Those are good numbers. And what did he miss? You guessed it. The one I was totally embarrassed by, the one that did not address what I believe to be my own values. I crossed off "Hard Body" and added "Computer Geek." Wow 15/15
So - I initiated a "sneaker date" of my own. He thought he was working on the web-site. I got rid of the kid and cooked him dinner. By the end of the evening it was very clear that the "attraction" thing was NOT a problem. And a year later we got married. So the moral of the story? If you are one of those people that follow your heart, and your heart tends to screw you over and over - try letting your head weigh in on it once in awhile. 6 years later, I am truly living the dream, I have the best husband, partner, lover, computer guy in the world! I'd say lucky me - but it was a calculated coup, and I couldn't be happier.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Hamster Home-Life
Well, since the last post I have been trying to be effective, position myself to be helpful, even. What have I accomplished? I completed an "Oiled Wildlife Response" class; I have taken three courses on-line from FEMA on Incident Command Systems, I have renewed my basic life support (first aid) credentials. Next week I take the BP sponsored HAZMAT training, and check out a Florida DART (disaster animal response team) meeting. I have register myself to volunteer, but I am only going to be able to answer phones or whatever. I have registered the little girl and I to help with pre-oil beach clean up if it looks to threaten our local beaches.
But - what have I accomplished? Probably nothing. In order to actually be involved in clean up, either on the beaches, or with the animals, I have to be affiliated with a group that will be called (DART is one, Suncoast Seabird Sanctuary another), and even if I start volunteering with those groups, I don't get to go out in the field until I have completed their required hours or trainings. There will probably not be time before it is necessary, so I've sort of resigned myself to volunteering anyway I can, even if it means paperwork, or dealing with the public. I just think that any of us that can do something, should. So I'm willing to do whatever I can.
Oh - and there was a tie-dye party with 15 or so of my daughter's friends (at my house). And the gym pool party (at the local pool). And the first day at Adventure Island for the season. And my first week at being a per-diem home health therapist. And good - GREAT- news about my mom's cancer.
Life is good.
But - what have I accomplished? Probably nothing. In order to actually be involved in clean up, either on the beaches, or with the animals, I have to be affiliated with a group that will be called (DART is one, Suncoast Seabird Sanctuary another), and even if I start volunteering with those groups, I don't get to go out in the field until I have completed their required hours or trainings. There will probably not be time before it is necessary, so I've sort of resigned myself to volunteering anyway I can, even if it means paperwork, or dealing with the public. I just think that any of us that can do something, should. So I'm willing to do whatever I can.
Oh - and there was a tie-dye party with 15 or so of my daughter's friends (at my house). And the gym pool party (at the local pool). And the first day at Adventure Island for the season. And my first week at being a per-diem home health therapist. And good - GREAT- news about my mom's cancer.
Life is good.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Black Gold
The tragedy in the Gulf is a little more than my brain can handle. If I pay too much attention I feel compelled to do something - but what? I can throw small amounts of money at it. I would love to be amongst the masses up of people pulling helpless oil soaked animals out of nests and washing them up. I'd like to be cracking the heads of oil-execs and politicians that allowed the circumstances that made this possible. I would like to live a life completely independent of petroleum products. I would like to be able to tell my daughter that all of the baby turtles hatching this month along the gulf coast will be OK. I would like to be able to comfort the families who lost loved ones in the explosion, and the tell all of the families and towns on the Gulf Coast that their livelihoods are secure. None of that will happen. As a citizen of earth, I feel vague, deep, uneasy pain, and a huge sense of responsibility. My ex-husband used to call it "Earth-Hurt" and tease me about my sensitivity to global crisis'.
As I have said, I have friends on all sides of the political spectrums, but when it comes to individual events, most people with heart weigh in on the side of humanity. I was appalled at some of the commentary I have seen lately. I get that environmentalists, with their "doom's day, we are raping the earth" approach, are annoying to the political right. These fear tactics do not make people any more sympathetic to their cause than "Obama is an Islamic terrorist" groups help the lefties take the agendas of the right seriously. But this oil spill is huge, and tragic, and needs to be a cross party discussion. There is no room for debate - fix the freakin' problem and make sure it does not happen again, while we shift our entire fuel consumption to renewable, safe sources.
Someone I know (not a friend, a friend of a friend) actually posted a comment that the environazis need to "get over it." Oil came from the earth, and the earth will reabsorb this, like it has been doing for billions of years, and everything will be fine. WTF??????? The earth has been doing a pretty good job of keeping that pool of black death locked up well below the surface for a really long time. I was amazed that the poster acknowledged that the earth may be older than 6,000 yrs old - this is what I get for stereo-typing idiots.
I hardly ever show my deep, artsy side, but after the Exxon Valdez spill I wrote a poem that I'll share - I haven't written any poetry in about 11 years, its hard to remember that for most of my life I wrote alot - but here goes (the title is because I heard the verdict on the trial on Mother's day, 1994)
Mother's Day
Black blood spilling
Onto the foaming surf.
Waves stilled
In crude submission
Colours swirl
From blue to black.
Death by entrapment
In the wounds
of Earth.
Liquid gold,
More precious than
Diamonds.
Carbon can be cruel.
Gaia's blood burns
Profiting the
Parasites that
Poison
our Mother
As I have said, I have friends on all sides of the political spectrums, but when it comes to individual events, most people with heart weigh in on the side of humanity. I was appalled at some of the commentary I have seen lately. I get that environmentalists, with their "doom's day, we are raping the earth" approach, are annoying to the political right. These fear tactics do not make people any more sympathetic to their cause than "Obama is an Islamic terrorist" groups help the lefties take the agendas of the right seriously. But this oil spill is huge, and tragic, and needs to be a cross party discussion. There is no room for debate - fix the freakin' problem and make sure it does not happen again, while we shift our entire fuel consumption to renewable, safe sources.
Someone I know (not a friend, a friend of a friend) actually posted a comment that the environazis need to "get over it." Oil came from the earth, and the earth will reabsorb this, like it has been doing for billions of years, and everything will be fine. WTF??????? The earth has been doing a pretty good job of keeping that pool of black death locked up well below the surface for a really long time. I was amazed that the poster acknowledged that the earth may be older than 6,000 yrs old - this is what I get for stereo-typing idiots.
I hardly ever show my deep, artsy side, but after the Exxon Valdez spill I wrote a poem that I'll share - I haven't written any poetry in about 11 years, its hard to remember that for most of my life I wrote alot - but here goes (the title is because I heard the verdict on the trial on Mother's day, 1994)
Mother's Day
Black blood spilling
Onto the foaming surf.
Waves stilled
In crude submission
Colours swirl
From blue to black.
Death by entrapment
In the wounds
of Earth.
Liquid gold,
More precious than
Diamonds.
Carbon can be cruel.
Gaia's blood burns
Profiting the
Parasites that
Poison
our Mother
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)